PDA

View Full Version : Naked Madonna pics advertise condoms


In2It2ENJOY
06-11-2001, 09:27 PM
Enraged singer threatens to sue
Madonna is threatening to take a New York-based photographer to court. His crime? Selling a nude photo of her to a company that has used it to promote its condoms. According to America's New York magazine, a pharmaceutical company in Europe has bought the rights to use nude photos of the singer on its safe-sex products. Already hot items in Europe and Japan, about 50,000 of the Madonna condoms are making their way to the United States. The product recently went on sale at Condomania in New York. A saleswoman at the shop says, 'We had them in, but they sold out fast. We expect to be getting more.' The naked shots were taken by photographer Martin Schreiber in 1979, when Madonna was a struggling young artist taking odd jobs to make a quick buck. The photos were first sold to Playboy magazine in 1985, after Madonna's career had skyrocketed with hits like Holiday. The singer had no problem with Playboy using the images at the time and admitted she signed a standard photographer's release. But she's now said to be furious that Schreiber has licensed them for condoms. A representative for Madonna's US licenser says: 'They're an unauthorised product, and we're considering legal action. They're not official.'

http://www.peoplenews.com/news/0,3430,5800,00.html

BottledErotica
06-12-2001, 06:36 AM
wow
thats interesting
heh

PeanutLove
06-13-2001, 12:46 PM
:t

Madonna does NOT own those pics. That man can do whatever he wants with them.

As long as Madonna signed a release form(which she did) there is nothing she can do...NOTHING!

She just can't handle not being in control of something.

Sorry but she is in the wrong here.

delicious dish
06-13-2001, 12:53 PM
Originally posted by PeanutLove
:t

Madonna does NOT own those pics. That man can do whatever he wants with them.

As long as Madonna signed a release form(which she did) there is nothing she can do...NOTHING!

She just can't handle not being in control of something.

Sorry but she is in the wrong here.

I disagree. The condom makers are using her image to sell condoms, it's like forcing her to endorse their product, and associate their name with hers. I think she has some firm legal ground to stand on here.....

PeanutLove
06-13-2001, 03:08 PM
So what if the condom makers are using her image.

What I am arguing is that she has no say over those pics..none. She was a nobody when those pics were taken, she signed release forms..there is nothing she can do. The photographer owns them pics, not Madonna, regardless if it is her image or not. He will choose to use those images as he pleases, those are his pics NOT Madonna's.

But I will agree with you aswell, she does has some say. Like ie; Madonna.com, she got that domain..it is hers(or is it? I haven't heard much about that since).

This will be interesting to see how this turns out.

zeroG
06-13-2001, 11:04 PM
Yeah..legally he can sell the rights to the pics, but im pretty sure Madonna has already lisenced her name...so they can use them, but they cannot use her name.
-G

In2It2ENJOY
06-15-2001, 01:54 AM
The Way I Look @ It, I'm Happy People R Practicing SAFE SEX...

Startrip80
06-15-2001, 02:04 AM
Madonna can do nothing really. The man that sold those pics to the condom company has also released a book of those pictures taken from those sessions. The pictures are his property and can do with them as he pleases.

I think the only thing she can really do is either get him on defication of character or some form of public slander. You would think with Madonnas naked ass all over the place on her own accord, she wouldnt mind having it on a box of condoms...

But alas, she's a mother now, and domesticated. I miss the ballsy "who gives a shit" Madonna of yester-year.

~Alan~

Madgealicious
06-16-2001, 10:01 AM
Originally posted by Startrip80
I think the only thing she can really do is either get him on defication of character or some form of public slander. You would think with Madonnas naked ass all over the place on her own accord, she wouldnt mind having it on a box of condoms...

It's defamation of character.

Otherwise, I am 100% in agreement with you (and my darling Peanut, natch.)

Startrip80
06-16-2001, 01:27 PM
I guess my mind was in the potty there for a second.

Alan