Careful, the Feds are reading this...

[kathaksung]

588. Extort the District Attorney (2/17/09)

In "558. D.A.'s discipline case and hiding evidence (7/9/08)" I talked about how the Feds intimidate the Deputy D.A. Field to frame the case on me. That case goes on intensified.

Five days ago, Mercury News reported,
"Bar judge: suspend prosecutor for 4 years
By Howard Mintz
Mercury News 2/12/09

Suggesting the harshest disciplinary punishment in recent history for a California prosecutor, a state bar judge Wednesday called for Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Ben Field to be stripped of his right to practice law in the state for four years because he "abused his prosecutorial power."

That "harshest punishment" will ends Field's career as a prosecutor. Since "misleading judge, withholding evidence" are common practice in District Attorneys' office, that recommendation is extraordinary unusual. It is an extortion. The purpose is clear: if Field doesn't frame a case in time the Feds given, he'll lose his job.

Why Field is chosen? He was once a star prosecutor, worked aggressively with the ambition of becoming district attorney or a county judge. I think Field has cooperated with the Feds to frame the "fake money", "drug money" cases on me. So far the plot went soured. But my articles keep on revealing the plot of the Inside Group. The pressure from the high ranking is so heavy that we saw this harshest punishment recommendation.

Of course, it's only a push. The Deputy D.A.'s suspension is on hold while he appeals. Field is still working as a prosecutor. People can expect he'll work his best to frame a case to hold his job. I must keep alert that more malicious trap will set up by those evil minds.

The similar extortion tactic is familiar to me. They had extorted the federal attorney of North California - Ryan. Ryan finally was fired in 2007. (In famous DOJ scandal "the firing of Eight Federal Attorneys". Among the eight Federal Attorneys, Ryan was the only one who lost his job not for political reason. I allege him losing the job for failed to frame a case on me.) See story:

In "474. New Federal Attorney and March plot (3/23/07)" I wrote: Two years ago, I already found Ryan was under pressure in my case and was intimidated "do it otherwise you'll be fired." I particularly wrote a comment about it. Now I have to say my sense was very correct.
475. The fired Federal Attorney and March plot (3/28/07) and "244. Push for an aggressive case (7/29/04)

There is also the case of extortion on Attorney General.
Three months ago, On 11/20, Attorney General Michael Mukasey collapsed in a speech and was sent to the hospital. I think it was an intimidation. When Feds planed false flag terror attack in US, they would have scapegoat to take the responsibility. Those who was reluctant to approve the plan would be punished by EM wave weapon. " (577. Mumbai attack (3) (12/17/08))

589. Regime change to control nuclear bomb of Pakistan (2/22/09)

Pakistan was Bush's ally in his eight years "war on terror". The military dictator, Musharraf, collaborated with US when he was the president of the Pakistan. Its intelligence, ISI, even helped the inside group in 911.

The head of Pakistan’s ISI, General Mahmud Ahmed, had ordered to wire $100,000 to the leader of 911 attack, Mohammed Atta through the hand of Omar Sheikh. This has been confirmed by the director of the FBI’s financial crimes unit, Dennis Lormel.

Quote, " Musharraf names 9/11 suspect as possible British asset
Fails to mention links to 9/11, ISI, CIA
By Devlin Buckley
© Copyright 2006,

http://fromthewilderness.com/members...ible_names.php

Co-operation is convenient. It's easy to deny. To take the responsibility for a nuclear attack is quite different. It will be carved deep in history. Will Japanese forget Hiroshima? Musharraf's group was not that stupid. Obviously they wouldn't play that role.

When a follower became disobedient, what US would do? Replaces him with a puppet of its own. Then we saw on September 10, 2007, a deported opposition politician, Nawaz Sharif landed in Islamabad. But he was sent back to Saudi Arabia immediately. The resistance of Pakistan regime was fierce. Anyhow, the plot went on. Next month, another US asset - Benazir Bhutto - was sent to Pakistan. She was warned by a bombing to her car convoy on Oct.18 and finally was assassinated two months later when she likely would have won the president election of Pakistan. Here is a news:

Quote, "Bhutto's death a blow to US
By BobinWright and Glenn Kessler 12/28/07
Washington Post

Washington - For Benazir Bhutto, the decision to return to Pakistan was sealed during a telephone call from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice just a week before Bhutto flew home in October."

How efficient it was. A big decision made just by a phone call. Be noticed the date of their return: Sharif flew back on 9/10. (Buhtto returned one month later.) It was only ten days from 8/30/07 - the day when a B-52 flew US continent with six nuclear missiles. And that nuclear terror attack plot went soured.

The effort of a regime change was going on covertly. Mosharraf stepped down one year later.

Quote, "US backed Musharraf resigns in Pakistan
By Jane Pertez 8/19/08
New York Times

Islamabad, Pakistan - Facing imminent impeachment charges, President Pervez Musharraf announced his resignation on Monday, after months of belated recognition by US officials that he had become a waning asset in the campaign against terrorism."

You may also have noticed the resignation date. It was too just ten days after 8/8/08 - a day marked with Olympic opening ceremony in China, Russia invade Georgia and a massive armada of US, Britain and France headed for Iran. The day I said plotted for Iran war but went soured.

The timing accordance is not a coincidence. It indicates that the attempt for Iran war is urgent. When the main project went soured, a spare one immediately activated. That a false flag nuclear attack will be used to justify the war. The nuclear bomb this time will come from Pakistan.

[kathaksung]

Fat cat profit from Iraq war

When they attacked Daschel on his tax problem, GOP never talked a bit of how much money they embezzled from Iraq. That may be the reason why GOP is so fond of "war on terror". Because they always profit from a conflict, from fat budget of defense to profitable contract.

Ordinary people pay tax. Selected politicians vote for war. Fat cats make profit. That's US politics.

Quote, "A 'fraud' bigger than Madoff
Senior US soldiers investigated over missing Iraq reconstruction billions
By Patrick Cockburn in Sulaimaniyah, Northern Iraq

In what could turn out to be the greatest fraud in US history, American authorities have started to investigate the alleged role of senior military officers in the misuse of $125bn (£88bn) in a US -directed effort to reconstruct Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

The exact sum missing may never be clear, but a report by the US Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) suggests it may exceed $50bn, making it an even bigger theft than Bernard Madoff's notorious Ponzi scheme.

"I believe the real looting of Iraq after the invasion was by US officials and contractors, and not by people from the slums of Baghdad," said one US businessman active in Iraq since 2003. ....

The end of the Bush administration which launched the war may give fresh impetus to investigations into frauds in which tens of billions of dollars were spent on reconstruction with little being built that could be used. In the early days of the occupation, well-connected Republicans were awarded jobs in Iraq, regardless of experience. A 24-year-old from a Republican family was put in charge of the Baghdad stock exchange which had to close down because he allegedly forgot to renew the lease on its building......

Often sums paid out in cash were never recorded. In one case, an American soldier put in charge of reviving Iraqi boxing gambled away all the money but he could not be prosecuted because, although the money was certainly gone, nobody had recorded if it was $20,000 or $60,000.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...f-1622987.html

[kathaksung]

Fat cat profit from Iraq war

When they attacked Daschel on his tax problem, GOP never talked a bit of how much money they embezzled from Iraq. That may be the reason why GOP is so fond of "war on terror". Because they always profit from a conflict, from fat budget of defense to profitable contract.

Ordinary people pay tax. Selected politicians vote for war. Fat cats make profit. That's US politics.

Quote, "A 'fraud' bigger than Madoff

Senior US soldiers investigated over missing Iraq reconstruction billions
By Patrick Cockburn in Sulaimaniyah, Northern Iraq

In what could turn out to be the greatest fraud in US history, American authorities have started to investigate the alleged role of senior military officers in the misuse of $125bn (£88bn) in a US -directed effort to reconstruct Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

The exact sum missing may never be clear, but a report by the US Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) suggests it may exceed $50bn, making it an even bigger theft than Bernard Madoff's notorious Ponzi scheme.

"I believe the real looting of Iraq after the invasion was by US officials and contractors, and not by people from the slums of Baghdad," said one US businessman active in Iraq since 2003. ....

The end of the Bush administration which launched the war may give fresh impetus to investigations into frauds in which tens of billions of dollars were spent on reconstruction with little being built that could be used. In the early days of the occupation, well-connected Republicans were awarded jobs in Iraq, regardless of experience. A 24-year-old from a Republican family was put in charge of the Baghdad stock exchange which had to close down because he allegedly forgot to renew the lease on its building......

Often sums paid out in cash were never recorded. In one case, an American soldier put in charge of reviving Iraqi boxing gambled away all the money but he could not be prosecuted because, although the money was certainly gone, nobody had recorded if it was $20,000 or $60,000.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...f-1622987.html

[kathaksung]

Chandra Levy's case

Though Federal law enforcement agency hold big power, they still have a little check and balance in legislation such like they need legislation's approve for their "Patriot Act". When Rep. Gary Condit's case happened, I had a feeling it's almost the second edition of Clinton and Lewinsky scandal. All these need intelligence operation behind curtain. Affairs revealed, politicians told a lie try to cover the scandal, then evidence appeared to discridit them. At first, I didn't know why Condit was chosen. I got it when I saw the news said he is a member of 'intelligence committee'. A committee which oversees Federal law enforcement agency. That's the way they played once and again in peace time. Though Gary Condit was found having no relationship to Levy's death, he lost his nomination.

Why Chandra Levy had to die?

In Lewinsky scandal, Lewinsky and Linda Trip played a role of TIPS. They revealed the affair by a delibrate phone record. Nobody likes them. Nobody wants his privacy being secretly recorded by his friend.

So there is nobody want to play Linda Trip any more. If they want a scandal, and Chandra Levy had self dignity and refused to be a second Paula Jones, what would be the result?

Perhaps she did not want to play a role like that, Chandra was going for another job in state prison. Her death happened before her leaving. The last chance to use her in a scandal.

The news said she checked the map of the site before she going for the jogging. She was meeting an aquaintance for an appointment. It's obvious. Only she didn't know she had to die if she insisted not to be second Paula Jones.

[kathaksung]

Oil 13. Harassment from Feds (12/28/08)

I said oil price started to drop after my article of July 4th. When the planed Iran war went soured in August, the Inside group planed a financial crisis to stabilize the dollar. It started on 9/14, when Leman Brothers went bankruptcy.

Though some people don't believe it's my revelation that caused oil price drop, I felt it strongly. Not only by the swift reaction of the oil price change, but also by the heavy persecution from Feds. 9/14 (Leman Brother's bankruptcy) signals the start of financial tsunami. Next day I was blocked to post in internet. From 9/15 to mid December, in three months, for more than two months I was blocked from internet. In later October, someone intruded my front yard, doing some perpetual work on the phone connection box. I had to call phone company for a repair to revive the function. I failed to post in many web forums. Worst of all, my ISP AOL cancel the homepage service in October where I used to post my journal article "The dark side of US" every five days. They also announced the close of the MSN web sites where I post in more than a dozen groups.

Why do they do such an unusual, weird work? Because my analysis is very correct, Feds are afraid of it.

Re: 573. Big operation to censor my message (10/17/08)

I learned that the MSN web sites are abandoned by microsoft. It proves what I said in last message "other web site which having my aricle will be attacked too". It may also indict that a big operation is coming. The top goal of the Feds is to eliminate my revelation. My message is too true to exist in this information world.

Re: "Confirmed: Microsoft Gives Up On MSN Groups, Hands It Off To Multiply
Jason KincaidTechCrunch.com
Wednesday, October 15, 2008; 3:59 PM

We've received confirmation that Microsoft is handing over the reins to its MSN Groups property to the social network Multiply. Microsoft is planning to release a new service called Windows Live Groups in November, and apparently doesn't want to compete with itself. Oddly enough, Microsoft has chosen not to allow groups to transition between the two services, and instead is going to offer a migration tool that will allow users to take groups over to Multiply, which currently bills itself as the world's 8th largest social network.
.......
The Microsoft post also states that users will have until February 21, 2009 to migrate their groups over to Multiply, after which point the site will cease to exist.
This just seems weird - why would Microsoft abandon a sizable (but dwindling) chunk of users to an entirely unrelated social network? It's nice that they aren't leaving their users out in the cold, but why not just cut off new signups to MSN Groups and allow the legacy users to continue on in peace? Microsoft may appear to have made the gesture in good faith, but it's likely that the company is hoping users will scoff at the idea of having to migrate, and just sign up on the new Live service when it launches.

Whatever Microsoft's intentions, Multiply is sure to be happy with the deal, as it has just been handed millions of new users (we're trying to contact Microsoft for the exact number). "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101503025.html

The purpose of this oddly and weird decision is very clear for me - to censor my long time journal style revelation - "The dark side of US" and other messages. There will be a framed drug case prepared in November. So once Kat Hak Sung is eliminated in the framed case, he couldn't transfer (or in their word: migrate) the file to new site, this is why both AOL and Microsoft will clear the old site - no trace of "the dark side of US" will leave for people. That's a typical style of Feds.

AOL and Microsoft are two big firms. Their decision is unreasonable which will hurt their fame and popularity. The timing is not a coincidence. It will match the coming framed drug case which may come with some other big events as distraction. No one except the Feds can force the two giant firms to make such a weird decision.

Re: Dear AOL Hometown/FTP user,

We’re sorry to inform you that on Oct. 31, 2008, AOL® Hometown and FTP will be shut down permanently. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Though you will be able to modify your Hometown site and access FTP until this date, we urge you to save your AOL Hometown/FTP content immediately, and consider other options for hosting your site. ........
The AOL Hometown Team

(I wrote #533 on 10/17/08. I was blocked to post it for two weeks until today - 11/3/08))

[Churumbela]

Please note:

At the request of Homeland Security, all the posts in this thread have been re-organized to enable the government to more easily keep track of illicit activities. Thank you for your cooperation.

[Autumn]

Wow, how weird.

It's like there's a Dark Side to the USA or something....

[Churumbela]

Careful, Autumn. Now they're watching you, too!

[Mancy]

This thread is great.

I'm disappointed Kathaksung didn't mention the cameras and microphones the feds implanted in microwaveable popcorn kernels, particularly the ones with the butter. When they pop, some reaction turns them on and the specially designed microchip lodges into your teeth, and they record everything you say and send them back to the feds.

The project was called Breach Reviled Enrol...

[TB]

This thread should be in sexxors. Then the feds would be watching very closely.

[Rizzabella]

I should hope they're reading it. I'm not typing these posts up just for myself, you know. Someone needs to be reading what I have to say.

[kathaksung]

Now do you still doubt the truth of my messages?

590. Chandra Levy case and Jon Benet case (2/27/09)

At least three times I revealed the attempt to war on Iran. Later development proved my prediction is correct. (The B-52 incident and the cases of Georgia war, massive Armada to Iran which I could not foresee happened on the predicted date.) The result was serious. After the soured attempt of 8/8/08 Iran war , the Inside Group created a financial tsunami to stabilize the dollar. Of course, the re-action on me was furious. Lehman Brothers was announced bankruptcy on 9/14. During the time from 9/15 to 12/24, I was blocked to internet for more than two months. They also shut down my ISP - AOL's homepage service and MSN community groups where I had long time posting history. (record of this thread from the #1. Now it's #590) The purpose is clear: to eliminate my revelation.

When the Feds failed in all traps they had set up for me, what they now try to do is to frame me in some case depending on DNA evidence. That was what the news reported on 12/27/08 of "New probe planned in Jon Benet's death". See "579. Jon Benet case again (12/29/08)". The news avoided to talk about what caused the new probe. I dare to say it's DNA. Now two months passed. No new story. Why? I think they are waiting for another framed case. (my case)

Five days ago, there is another similar news. Quote,
"Huge break in Chandra Levy case
By Sari Horwitz and Scott Higham Washington Post

8 years later, arrest warrant sought for federal inmate in California.

......she (Lanier ) declined to say whether it involved DNA or a piece of physical evidence. "
(Mercury News, 2/22/09)

I think Chandra Levy was murdered by the Feds. The suspect now police is going to arrest, is a sacrifice. Like Lewinsky, Chandra was an aid too. Feds used to control politicians through their aids. Six years ago, I wrote, "When Rep. Gary Condit's case happened, I had a feeling it's almost the second edition of Clinton and Lewinsky scandal. All these need intelligence operation behind curtain. Affairs revealed, politicians told a lie try to cover up the scandal, then evidence appeared to discredit them. At first, I didn't know why Condit was chosen. I got it when I saw the news said he is a member of 'intelligence committee'. A committee which oversees Federal law enforcement agency. That's the way they played once and again in peace time. Though Gary Condit was found having no relationship to Levy's death, he lost his nomination.

..... So there is nobody want to play Linda Trip any more. If they want a scandal, and Chandra Levy had self dignity and refused to be a second Paula Jones, what would be the result?

Perhaps she did not want to play a role like that, Chandra was going for another job in state prison. Her death happened before her leaving. The last chance to use her in a scandal.

The news said she checked the map of the site before she going for the jogging. She was meeting an acquaintance for an appointment. It's obvious. Only she didn't know she had to die if she insisted not to be the second Paula Jones. "

Now in two months, the Feds pushes out two famous unsolved murder case. That's not a coincidence. They are under pressure. They try to frame a case. To justify the coming frame case, they play a pre-conception psychological operation. Try to make it reasonable by two popular cases.

It's funny that they dare not to say what the new evidence is. Perhaps because I have revealed many times in advance that their tactic is to plant DNA to frame. It's interesting that they made an announcement but didn't arrest the suspect. Because they are waiting for the Santa Clara D.A.'s office to issue an arrest warrant based on DNA on me. The deputy D.A. is under pressure - do it or you'll lose your job. The dramatic effect of popular cases would run over a case not so popular, but would justify it.

I still want to repeat, DNA, just like other evidence, can be planted. They can easily collect victim's hair, sperm and plant it like a gun. Especially the victim is under 24 hours surveillance. And all rubbish are in scrutiny. Even dirty water in drainage.

If the Feds is allowed to solve the case just depend on DNA, then they can frame any people they want to.

591. Driving Iran into a nuclear weapon trap (3/5/09)

Pakistan now goes the direction the US wants it to go. On 2/6, there was the news:

Disgraced Pakistan nuke scientist freed by court http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090206/...lear_scientist

A secret pact granted freedom to Pakistan nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan, who lived under house arrest for allegedly leaking atomic weapons secrets to Iran, North Korea and Libya. It is obviously releasing a bait for Iran. Now the freed nuclear scientist is able to go on with his proliferation mission if there is a buyer. Iran is a potential customer.

Does Iran want to own nuclear weapon? Yes, it does. Does Iran know the danger it faces if it develops atomic bomb? Yes, it does, too. Iran knows it may risk a possible military invasion from US. Then how did Iran solve this problem? To develop the program in Syria, I think. It was a smart strategy. But US won't let it go. So we see the story that Israel bombed a site in Syria in a raid on 9/6/2007. Both countries gave little information about the incident. Syria even denies it, leaves it a mystery. Seven months later, there was a later report:

Quote, "U.S. displays images used to justify Israeli attack on Syria
See as evidence of N.Korea collaboration on reactor
By David E. Sanger New York Times

Washington - The Bush administration released detailed photographic images Thursday to support its assertion that the building in Syria that Israel destroyed in an air-strike last year was a nuclear reactor built with years of help from North Korea."

I believe the nuclear reactor was built for developing nuclear weapon. Iran joined the project because it did not want to take the responsibility of developing nuclear weapon in its land. I had read a news said that after the bombing Iran had sent inspectors to check the ruin site. What surprised me was that North Korea was part of the Trojan Horse plot to frame Iran.

[kathaksung]

Quote, "Poor Joe the Plumber Looks Lonely at His Own Book Signing

Posted by Melissa McEwan February 27, 2009.

Wow.

The event was scheduled to last three hours, but ended after 55 minutes, with Joe having sold a total of five books.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/1..._book_signing/

How media to cheat public

Though media makes him a popular figure, he is actually not a welcome man. Or he doesn't represent the grass root people. His story is only a soap opera conducted by GOP for their campaign. He became popular because media is controlled by Republican and they need to show that Republican Party supported by grass root people. But all that is only a propaganda. A book signing tells it all. After all Republican Party is for the interest of rich people, they are minor in US. They could win the election because they control the media and the intelligence. They selected politicians such like Bush by rigged election (becuase they control intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (they control media).

[Blake.]

I'm just curious, what exactly is this thread about?

[Churumbela]

Big Brother, of course.